Why are our states protecting the "honour" of criminals instead of our right of free speech?

Why are our states protecting the “honour” of criminals instead of our right of free speech?

It’s very funny how the West is strictly applying definitions for linguistic offence while definitions of heinous crimes against humanity and populations are always subjected to debate… showing the finger to a well-known criminal seems to be a bigger offence than the crimes he committed. Like the bully on the schoolyard, you have no right to say anything… otherwise… this is a state oppression and criminal-intent-driven omertà on free speech and human values. States are in connivance with the bully and the criminal and are criminal themselves in oppressing their population to protect criminals. I see no reason that stands for the social contract anymore as just coercion is the only thing that keeps our states together. Our forefathers fought with their blood for freedom; we have the obligation to keep the freedom if we want happiness and human values to prevail. Where are the free men??? Where are the ones with a pure heart, clean eyes???