What is evil good for?

It was not created, so it’s not a thing; it’s a corruption of what was created. A stained white is not really white anymore, so there is no good in a stain, as one should always prefer not to have it.

Some will argue that void is good because without void we could not comprehend space, but I would like to remind them that void is just nothing, and virtue cannot be attached to nothing.

One would also say that evil is the opposite of good in order to understand the duality of moral principle, then choose the good part. I argue that one needs this distinction because he has it inside him and uses a materialistic comprehension of the world.

One needs to see the devil outside in order to see the devil inside oneself.

A materialistic comprehension excludes the metacognition and transcendental awareness that can only be by the heart.

Once you see the world as one, there is no more good and evil, and in this regard evil has no meaning.

Only a decadent spirit needs the feces to be aware of the spirit of the roses.