Is Substack a tentacle of criminal media covering crimes?
Substack a tentacle of criminal media covering crimes?
I guess that the media blackout on this award-winning article—see below—is because this is viewed as an “antisemitic hit piece.” Is it? Is this piece antisemitic, or is it not?
If it’s not, then why are there no headlines whatsoever? Is our media covering crimes? Is our media free, or is it complicit in crimes—which would mean our media is criminal itself? Is our media criminal? And the politicians steering the public agenda, where these crimes should be discussed, not covered—are they covering crimes? Are our politicians criminals?
Somebody to answer? Crickets...?? Yes... crickets...
Substack shadowbanning this note does equal covering crimes; it means Substack is criminal too. Somebody to disagree?? Nobody? Yeah... nobody...
As I was thinking, Substack is just the “illusion of communication while keeping us all separated under the impression of being together...so we actually stay separated…” Nice manipulation. What would one expect from a tentacle of the criminal media?
Some will say that this did not get the deserved attention because of “corporate risk assessment,” “graphic content,” etc., etc.
Well, if the contrary were true—if the victims were on the “east side of the fence” and not toward the seashore line side, this would be everywhere for weeks.
So, this “asymmetric treatment of information” proves intent and crime, period!!!